Empowering the Next Generation of Women in Audio

Join Us

Recording Guitars and Bass

Hey SoundGirls! This month’s blog is a continuation of the last month. In March, I started writing about the process of recording a simple four-piece band. I started with drums. This month I will be moving on to guitars and bass.

Guitars.

Recording this instrument is truly in its own ball game. Capturing guitar tones is an art and a skill that has to be honed. Having a good ear is essential for recording any kind of guitars. For time sake, I’ll just be covering recording electric guitars and bass. (I’ll make a blog about recording acoustic later on – I promise).

I’m going to create a scenario here (there are many different factors that go into what mics you’ll pick depending on the kind of gear the guitarist is using). Let’s say he is playing a Fender Jazzmaster through an Orange combo with your standard pedal board (reverb, delay, distortion, compressor). For this setup, I usually like to keep it simple. I’d go with a dynamic, and a condenser microphone. Although for this, I’ll make it interesting and go with a ribbon microphone rather than a condenser. Recently I’ve been recording electric guitars with a Royer 121 (ribbon mic) paired with a dynamic microphone (usually an sm57 or an sm7b).

Placement

For the SM57, I will place this facing directly at the center of the cone of the speaker. For the Royer 121, I will place this off-center of the cone all while setting up the mics to have a “good phase.” Alright, now that we have picked our microphones and placed them on the amp- let’s pick our signal chain and start getting tones!

For pre-amps, I’m going to send the SM57 through a Shadow Hill. On the Shadow Hill model, I am familiar with; you can pick what kind of metal you want your sound running through. You can choose from nickel, steel, or have a mix of the two called “discrete.” Let’s go with discrete. Since its an SM57, we aren’t getting much warmth from the microphone. This is why I picked a tube pre-amp. I want to have some color. For the Royer 121, I want to send this through a Neve 1073. My reasoning for this is because I really want to have full control of the sound here. With the 1073, I have some simple high, low, and mid-band eqs to mess with after I dial in the mic. If I hear something I don’t like- I can take it out without there being a dramatic change. That’s my main reason for picking this pre for this mic. Before we move on, I want to touch on why I chose the Royer 121. The 121 is a ribbon. Ribbons are known for being a little dark. In this situation, I don’t mind, because we are recording guitars. Especially where I have placed the ribbon mic on the amp, having a dark microphone will round out the top end of what we are getting from the guitar a bit.

Bass

For this instrument, nine times out of ten for live tracking I send the bass DI through a tube pre-amp. Which tube pre do you use, you ask? Well, it depends on what studio I am working out of. The studio I went to school at, and still, frequently occupy while recording with my band- I use the Voxbox. So, let’s say we are at that studio. I like to use the Voxbox because it also has a built-in compressor. I just tap the compressor a bit to put the bass in its place during tracking, and usually, heavily compress in the box during mixing. The Avalon is another great pre-amp choice for tracking bass. Both of the pre-amps have built-in EQs that you can use to bring out the fundamental of the bass.

Here is a mic sheet with the added addition of what we added to our session today.

Instrument Mic Wall Input Pre-amp Compressor Eq Pro-Tools Input
Kick In D112 1 API 1 DBX 1
Kick Out Fet47 2 API 2 2
Snare T Sm57 3 API 3 Chandler Little Devil 3
Snare B Km84 4 API 4 4
Rack Tom V421 5 Vintech 1 5
Floor Tom V421 6 Vintech 2 6
H.H SM7B 7 TubeTech 1 7
O.H Hat Coles 8 Gamma 1 (shadow hills) 8
O.H Ride Coles 9 Gamma 2 (shadow hills) 9
Room L Royer 121 10 UA 610 Distressor 10
Room R Royer 121 11 UA 610 Distressor 11
Bass DI J48 DI 12 Voxbox 12
Elec Dynamic SM57 13 Gamma 1 (shadow hills) 13
Elec Ribbon Royer 121 14 Neve 1073 14

Post, Theatre, Foley, and SoundGirls

Working as a one woman sound recordist and boom op in a short film

As this is my first SoundGirls blog post, I thought it would be a good idea to make it a bit of an introductory one. So hi! My name is Iida Aino Viljanen, and I’m originally from Finland hence the difficult name. I’m a sound designer (and a composer but work mostly in sound design), and I work in both audio post-production for film/video and in theatre. I don’t know if many sound designers like to combine these two areas of work (at least I’ve not met anyone else but hi to all of you who also do this!), but I think it’s an excellent way to keep things exciting. Don’t get me wrong, I love working with both, but it’s refreshing to being able to switch between the two as, even though the process is very similar, the work is also very, very different. Recently, however, I’ve been working more with post-production sound, so I’m hoping there will be some theatre projects ahead in the near future! I’ve also done a little bit of production sound recording/boom operating and that’s something I’m planning to do more in the future as I found it very interesting.

I wanted to become SoundGirls’ blogger as I think this is an amazing channel to find about other audio women’s work and support each other. I mostly work with men in my day-to-day life (however I’ve recently been working with more and more women directors yay! But most audio people I work with are still men, so it’s awesome and inspiring to read what other women are up to and what their experiences in this industry are. Weirdly enough I’ve been also really missing writing after graduating from university so writing this blog fills that gap nicely!

I used to work full-time as an Assistant Dubbing Mixer in broadcast in the UK but after recently relocating to Stockholm, Sweden, I’ve been working as a freelancer. I think both work situations have their pros and cons, but at the moment I am enjoying the possibility of working on very different projects which freelancing allows me to do. Although, it’s at times also very stressful as you need to find your own work and can get a bit lonely. I work mostly on my own devices, but luckily I also freelance at a local audio post-production studio a couple of days a week where I can meet other sound people and people in general. So I don’t become a complete hermit!

I’m still quite early in my career, learning something new almost every day, and I’d say working as an Assistant Dubbing Mixer in post-production house after graduating from university was a beneficial and educational experience that taught me a lot about the work itself but also about the industry we work in. So, to any students or new graduates, I’d recommend applying for runner or assistant level jobs and internships in post-production houses or even just asking if you could shadow someone. It makes a huge difference even in your confidence to see how more experienced persons do things. It’s great to learn from more experienced sound professionals and adapt their workflows to your own. Freelancing can be very lonely, leaving plenty of room for self-doubt, and it helps when you know what you’re doing. Even just seeing a senior-level Dubbing Mixer’s Pro Tools template can be very helpful for your own work. My university course at Glasgow School of Art was excellent (would highly recommend it!) and I learned a lot there but working as an assistant was an even bigger learning curve for me as the tv industry really can be hectic, and you must learn to work fast as well as know your Pro Tools.

I know I would find freelancing more complicated and I would doubt myself a great deal in my work had I not worked in post-production house after graduating. Though, I do realise getting these jobs or even an internship can be tough when there’s plenty of other students applying for the same positions. However, my hot tip is to email all the places you know and to research some more. I’ve noticed that runner and assistant level positions tend not to be advertised very often as annoying as that is, so sometimes they might have been thinking about hiring some help and then boom your email hits their inbox. Just remember to include a showreel or an example of your work to your email – even some university work is good or your final project if you don’t have a showreel yet. It’s much easier to get noticed when they already hear your work and skill level.

Recently I’ve been recording quite a lot of foley for short films, and I’ve enjoyed that! Foley is something I’ve only done a little bit previously, but after these films, I’d love to do it more often as it’s certainly fun. I’ve already noticed that I’m looking at items in grocery stores with Foley in my mind wondering what kind of sounds different things could make. One thing which is not fun though is footsteps and specifically cutting footsteps. After vocalising my frustration about this one of my friends told me about this fantastic invention called Edward Foley Instrument which is a Kontakt player compatible VST that allows you to create footsteps using a midi keyboard. To me, that sounds like a dream come true and according to my friend, it’s genuinely life-changing so this is going to be my next investment! At least a video of it looks great, check it out if you too want to cry while editing footsteps.

Oh and as I’ve found out during my foley experimenting if you ever need to record poop smearing sounds porridge works wonders!

Foley recording porridge aka cow poo

That’s about it for this time! As I previously mentioned I have recently relocated to Stockholm so if you’re a SoundGirl living in Stockholm, please get in touch via Twitter or you can find my email address on my website! I would love to meet other audio women here.

I thought it would be a fun idea to finish my posts with little recommendation lists of podcasts, videos, and articles about women in audio that I’ve found interesting. So here goes my first list of recommended content:

Tonebenders – Episode 099. Sound Design for VFX Round Table (Podcast)

(Can also be found on SoundCloud and Podcasts-app.)

Nia Hansen (Avengers films) and Paula Fairfield (Game of Thrones) discuss designing creature and superhero sounds, and honestly, this was one of the most interesting and inspiring discussions I’ve heard for a while.

Sisters of Sound – Episode 15. Sound Editor Claire Dobson (Podcast)

(Can also be found on Podcasts-app.)

To be honest this whole series is worth listening to as it’s all about women in audio – not just in audio post-production but also in music, sound art, engineering, etc. but I thought this episode was especially interesting as they interview sound editor Claire Dobson who’s worked for example on The Handmaid’s Tale, Vikings and Fargo.

LNA Does Audio Stuff (Youtube channel)

My dear friend LNA had enough of the male dominance of Youtube audio tutorials so she made her own channel. If you are wondering about which speakers to buy for your home studio, how to set up a home studio or how to get started with Ableton then check this channel out! LNA is also open for suggestions so if you have an audio question you’d like an answer for or if you want to know how something is done message her or comment on her videos and she’ll make a tutorial for it!

Find more Podcasts with Women in Audio here

If you want to follow me elsewhere here are the links to do so:

Iida Aino is a sound designer and composer based in Stockholm, Sweden. She’s originally from Finland but has spent most of her adult life living, studying and working in the UK and has only recently relocated to Stockholm. She graduated with a Master degree in Sound for the Moving Image from Glasgow School of Art in 2017. Even though she’s still early on in her career her work already includes short films, tv programmes, adverts, installations, and theatre shows. Currently, she works as a freelancer and won the Best Sound Design Award at the feminist Underwire Film Festival in London in 2018. Iida Aino enjoys all things audio (especially spatial audio is an area she’d like to experiment more with!) and loves the way women in this industry support each other. iidaainosound.wordpress.com

Read Iida’s Blog

 

An Interview With Rising Sound Technicians

I’ve been a part of the sound industry since 2000, and I have been working professionally since 2005.  The industry was different back then, at least for me. I didn’t have any women as role models. I didn’t even have many women as contemporaries, so my experience at the beginning was pretty daunting.  That’s not true. At first, I had no worries. I was confident in my chosen degree program in Commercial Music. I was learning how to combine my first true love, music, with my newly found interest, sound.

I remember my very first moment of recognition that being a woman in the sound industry was not the norm. I was working in the recital halls at my university as a sound technician and live recording technician.  It was my regular practice to discuss the logistics of the concert with the artist before we began so that I would know what to expect for the day. A particularly high profile artist was invited to give a concert at my college one year, and I was the lead technician on that show.  I approached his manager to ask my regular questions, and he just stared at me like I had nine heads. I thought to myself, ”I’m only 19 years old, he must be freaked out because I’m so young.” To break the awkward silence, I asked one more question, and his response was, “Who’s in charge here?”  As the lead technician, I was in charge, so I told him I would be leading this event. Again, we stood in silence, staring at each other, until he finally decided to respond. I will never forget his words. “Just go get your boss, sweetheart, and I’ll tell him everything he needs to know.” That’s when I knew that it wasn’t just my age that would make things difficult; it was my gender.  I was mortified. I honestly did not know how to respond. Everything after that is mostly a fury-fueled blur, but I think, in my agitation, I just quietly walked away and did my job the best way I knew how.

Women in this industry still struggle with situations like mine every single day.  The thing that is different now is the steadily growing show of support and representation.  I wanted to know how young women breaking into the sound industry were feeling about it all, so I went straight to the source.  For this month’s blog, I decided to interview my current 9-month intern, Kate Russell, and one of my two-year conservatory students, Lilly Martinez.  Here’s what they had to say:

What is your name, age, and employment/education status?

KR: Kate Russell, 20, Assistant Sound Design Intern at PCPA-Pacific Conservatory Theatre

LM: I am Lilly Martinez. I am an 18-year-old full-time student.

When did you first become interested in sound?

KR: We were doing a production of Annie at my middle school when I was in the 7th grade, and I wanted to be the one to play the music and work with the mics.

LM: That’s a tricky question… I suppose my first interest in sound sparked in high school theatre. My interest deepened toward the end of high school when I began dating a musician who was an involved member of my hometown’s local music community, however, my first serious interest in sound was more recent in my academic endeavors when I actually was able to get my hands on some of the tech used in sound.

What are your career goals?

KR: I want to be a post-production sound engineer for film and television.

LM: I think my career goals focus more on involvement.  I want to work in dynamic areas that challenge skill and set-up. In my career, I want most to help promote culture and diversity. As a Hispanic woman raised in Southern California, I grew up in a heavily diverse community that fostered much of my own culture. I also had the privilege of studying ASL and interacting with the Deaf community. They inspired me to look into Deaf theatre and performances.  I hope that I can help amplify the voices and experiences of those lesser heard or known, regardless of company or title.

What does it mean to you to be a woman in sound?

KR:  To me being a woman in sound means that I am helping to bring about a change in the demographic of an entire industry. Just as theatre is for everyone, the realms of production behind the scenes should not, and cannot be exclusive.

LM:  To be a woman in sound is to be an artist that perseveres in expression regardless of surrounding social stagnancy.

Who are your role models?

KR:  My teachers and mentors:  Elisabeth Weidner (PCPA Sound Director), Abby Hogan (PCPA Scenic Charge), Zoia Wiseman (PCPA Staff Stage Manager), as well as Marisha Ray (Creative Director of Critical Role).

LM:  My role models are the dedicated and passionate artists who constantly show me the limitations others and myself create, are false. This includes Sound Designer Elisabeth Weidner for all her inspiring work, and Sound Designer and Engineer Talitha G. Blackwell.

Do you feel the weight of being underrepresented as a woman in sound?  

KR:  I have been fortunate early in my career to have teachers and mentors who are women, so it hasn’t really hit me yet, but I’m sure the more I travel and gain experience, that weight will become heavier.

LM:  In my experience, the majority of people I have had conversations about sound with have been white men. In high school, a male drama teacher and arts coordinator were the only people I had to rely on and ask questions regarding sound. Past students in my position were boys as well. It wasn’t until I began my studies at PCPA-Pacific Conservatory Theatre that I met women and people of color in sound. I never felt like I could connect or relate to the people around me who would get excited about sound until I met another woman in this field. This is probably the reason it took me so long to take a serious interest in it. There is a silent added pressure to be outstanding and firm as a woman in sound. Sound already tends to be swept aside in conversations about technical theatre. Voices of women have an added fight to be both heard and accepted.

How would you like to see the industry change?

KR:  I would like to see more women in leadership roles in sound, such as department director or producer.

LM:  I would like to see outreach to diverse groups in younger ages. I was swept into sound much like Dorothy and Toto once I left home. If I’d had that same exposure, if I’d had the conversations about sound in my youth that I have in my adult life, It would have been life-changing.

Describe your proudest sound moment.

KR:  My proudest theatrical sound moment was getting to run sound for a show at the Edinburgh Fringe Festival.

LM:  Surprisingly, my proudest sound moment happened outside of theatre. I had struck up a conversation with a more distant friend of mine who is a musician, and as we talked, I realized just how much my knowledge had grown. I felt well-armed for this conversation.

What is the best piece of advice you’ve ever been given?

KR: “You miss 100% of the shots you don’t take.”  I grew up playing various sports, as well as involving myself in theatre, so this quote became very prevalent in my life at an early age.  It applies to almost every aspect of life and is a great motivator for me to just sit down and do the thing.

LM:  A smart person takes critique. A wise person knows when to listen to it.

What advice do you have for young women starting out in the sound industry?

KR:  Don’t be afraid to fail.  Failure is how we learn and grow, both as artists and people. Failure can be intimidating, especially if you are the minority entering into a field, but don’t let that stop you from pursuing your goals.  Let it fuel you to surpass those who would try to keep you down.

LM:  Believe in your capability to grow, and live for the moments when your work gives you goosebumps.

 

Mix With the Masters Scholarships Available

SoundGirls Members have the chance to receive a 1000 euro scholarship provided to SoundGirls members from Mix With The Masters. There are two scholarships available for the week-long session with Leslie Braithwaite (Cardi B, Rick Ross, Pharrell Williams..)

This is a week-long seminar valued approximately at 4,000 euros and includes lectures and workshops, accommodation within the mansion, catering (breakfast, lunch, dinner) the fitness room, swimming pool and shuttles from Avignon to the studio.

You must have an advanced understanding of audio and work as producer/mixer/engineer to attend Mix with the Masters.

Session Dates: April 16 – April 22

Apply for the scholarships here

Deadline to apply is March 30th

You are responsible for Travel to France.

Session Includes

  • private bedroom, on site within the mansion for 6 nights
  • Full-board accommodation with meals prepared by gourmet chefs on-site
  • Return shuttle services from Avignon to Studios La Fabrique
  • Unlimited drinks and snacks throughout the week
  • Approximately 50 hours in the studio with the guest speaker
  • One-on-one time between you and the master to assess and work on your own material
  • Professional photography done throughout the week, including portrait shots of you with the Master
  • Hundreds of full-resolution photos shared with you afterwards via download link, to keep and use as you please
  • A certificate of completion issued on behalf of Mix With the Masters and Studios La Fabrique, signed by the Master if you wish
  • Exclusive MWTM merchandise given only to seminar attendees: embossed Moleskine notepads, pens, mugs, t-shirts, USB keys and stickers.
  • Use of the La Fabrique swimming pool, garden, fitness centre, and scenic walks
  • Nearby access to the enchanting town of St. Rémy de Provence

About Leslie Braithwaite

Leslie’s impressive list of GRAMMY awards include TLC’s Fanmail (Best Rap Album), Brandy and Monica’s single, “The Boy is Mine” (Best R&B Performance by a Duo or Group), Outkast’s Stankonia (Best Rap Album), Pharrell Williams’ G I R L (Best Urban Contemporary Album) and “Happy” (Best Pop Solo Performance, 2015) . He’s still based in Atlanta today, where he continues to craft his signature sound and grow his admirable résumé.

Credits:
Pharrell Williams, Outkast, Björk, TLC, Jay Z, Madonna, Ludacris, Young Jeezy, Akon, T.I., Monica, Michael Jackson, Cher, Mary J. Blige, 2Pac, Notorious B.I.G., GRAMMY Awards for Best R&B performance by Duo or Group – Brandy and Monica The Boy Is Mine (1999), Best R&B Album – TLC, FanMail (2000), Best R&B Performance by a Duo or Group – TLC, No Scrubs (2000), Best Rap Album – OUTKAST, Stankonia (2002), Best Urban Contemporary Album – Pharrell Williams, GIRL (2015), Best Pop Solo Performance – Pharrell Williams, Happy (2015)


Program

The process of greatness fostering greatness has long been recognized and is the reason why master classes are organized. The Mix With The Master’s seminars is part of this tradition, offering an exchange of in-depth first-hand studio experience and knowledge that is unparalleled and not available anywhere else. Each seminar is conducted by one of the world’s top music mixers and producers, ready to share their professional secrets with a select group of a maximum of 14 carefully-screened, professional-level participants, who come from all over the world.

One factor that contributes to the enormous success of the seminars is that all tutors support the general MWTM ethos, which is about the love of music, music technology and wanting to help others. Participants also are in part selected on displaying similar, positive attitudes. The fact that the seminars last a full week is another major contributory factor because it offers tutors the time and space to go into real depth, and the participants the opportunity to spend a prolonged time watching a master at his peak, and to ask any question they can think of.

The tutors share exclusive, insider-information on any subject: detailed technical knowledge, how to run sessions, how to handle artists, how to manage a career, the right attitude, how to remain successful, and more. The tutors also assess the work of the participants, by listening to their mixes and mixing recording sessions that they bring, and providing extensive feedback to each participant on where they are at, and how they can get to where they want to be. This is invaluable and offers participants wanting to become world-class professionals in their own right a unique advantage.

Another primary factor in making the MWTM seminars exceptional is that they take place at La Fabrique, a large, comfortable, high-end recording studio located in a picturesque historic building, surrounded by huge, lush grounds, and set in the south-east for France in one of the world’s most beautiful environments. The secluded and idyllic location offers the participants and tutors a lot of space to relax and recharge, far away from the hustle and bustle of daily life and the all-demanding intensity of their regular professional environments.

Because the courses are residential, the participants and tutor work, eat, socialize, and sleep in the same environment. While tutors, and participants, will at times opt to retire to their private quarters, there is ample opportunity for social interaction outside of the studio environment. Participants interact extensively with each other and the tutor, making it easier to assimilate the intangible qualities necessary to be successful at the highest level—presence, focus, social skills, intelligence, creativity, the right attitude, and so on.

In short, for seven days participants can experience mixing with a master in both senses of the phrase, mixing and interacting with them. Get more information about Studio La Fabrique

 

 

When it stops running like clockwork – troubleshooting the basics

Live Digital Audio Part 4

What can you do when it goes wrong? Each live set up will vary, but there are a few fundamentals you can check before having to call tech support.

Snap, crackle, and pop – how to recognise digital issues

What does a sampling or word clock issue even sound like? Unfortunately, they can sound like all sorts of weird noises. As mentioned in previous posts, if your word clock starts to slip out of sync it will just sound a bit off. You may notice the stereo image doesn’t feel as big, or it sounds a little dull, or phasey. More disconcerting problems manifest themselves as strange periodical pops or clicks, or even like someone twanging a rubber band. Think of the 1s and 0s – if the information isn’t transmitted correctly there isn’t any intermediate value, there is no 0.5 in binary. The bit is either there, or it isn’t. Devices then try to read the empty (or partially empty, in the case of slight mistiming) slot and it may result in random noise. If we go back to our video analogy if you’re watching an analogue transmission and the reception goes bad, it will go fuzzy around the edges, but it’ll still be watchable. If a digital transmission does the same, the entire image tends to freeze, become pixelated, or fill with weird patterns and colours.

Don’t overcomplicate it

So what can you do about it? The number one step should be to make sure it is actually a digital issue. Don’t hear hooves and presume zebras. If something is crackling, make sure it isn’t a bad stage cable or piece of backline, etc. If there’s a weird noise, is it over the entire system or is it just on one or two channels? If it isn’t global, it’s more likely to be something like a broken input or analogue transmission line. If it’s over several channels, it could be crosstalk in a multipin cable or something in one area of the room that several mics are picking up.

If you’re certain it’s a sampling or word clock problem, think through the signal path methodically, like you would with any other fault. Make sure everything is still set to the correct sample rate, master clock, and IP address. Check your cables are seated correctly – this is especially important for BNC connectors. Due to the central pin being so small, if they aren’t in the socket completely straight, or are taking a lot of strain, they can lose too much of their connecting surface area and stop passing signal. Optimally (I always try to secure cables in such a way that the weight is taken off the connections for this reason. It also keeps the cable in good condition for longer). Double-check that you haven’t connected cables of differing impedance. Work from one end of the signal path to the other, swapping out cables or bypassing devices one at a time. Take it down to the simplest setup you can, removing things like effects units or even the desk. If your amps have the capability, playing music or pink noise directly into them can take a big chunk of your setup out of the equation. If you are still experiencing problems, check that everything’s firmware is up to date, or at least the same version as other devices of the same type (e.g., all the amps, or desk stage boxes).

Have you tried turning it off and on again?

If this is all in order, it’s time to turn things off and on again! I know it sounds like a cop-out, but power cycling devices (using that term in front of clients makes you sound more professional than saying you’re turning it off and on again) can force them to reset to the right settings, or do their boot-up checklist, where they do a sweep of the network and see other devices that they might have lost contact with for whatever reason. It might not be enough to just switch it off; completely unplugging the device from its power source and leaving it for half a minute can sometimes make it forget any bad information it had stored and start again. Of course, be sure to save anything you need, like your show file, before trying this step!

Make the call

If none of this helps, I’m sorry to say it’s time to call tech support. But here’s the secret to most tech’s tech support: it’s other techs. Nearly everyone in this industry has friends who know more than them about certain topics, which they can phone when they’re stuck.  If nothing else, they might know the solution just because they’ve had the same thing happen to them before. Yet another reason to be (genuinely) nice to everyone; we’re all part of a hive mind of knowledge, and nearly all of us are more than happy to help a colleague out of a bind. On top of this, audio equipment manufacturers are invested in making sure you don’t have bad experiences with their gear, and their support people are often ex-techs themselves, so they will definitely want to sort you out! There’s no shame in tapping into that knowledge if it gets the gig back up and running, and soon enough you’ll be the one who receives the panicked phone call half an hour before doors. Just remember that the more problems you experience, the more you can help others in the future.

Chance to Win Mix with the Masters with Tom Lord-Alge

SoundGirls this a chance to win a spot at Mix with the Masters with Tom Lord-Alge. This is a week-long seminar valued approximately at $4,500 and includes lectures and workshops, accommodation within the mansion, catering (breakfast, lunch, dinner) the fitness room, swimming pool and shuttles from Avignon to the studio.

You must have an advanced understanding of audio and work as producer/mixer/engineers to attend Mix with the Masters.

You are responsible for Travel to France. If you have won before you cannot enter.

The upcoming session will take place November 10 -16, 2018

You can purchase a raffle ticket for $10 (you can purchase more than one to increase your chances)

We will draw a winner on October 30th, and the winner will be notified on October 31st.

You will also be entered to win a second raffle to win a 25% discount off Mix with Masters with Tom Lord-Alge.


Tom Lord-Alge

Three-time Grammy Winner Tom Lord-Alge’s (TLA) extensive list of multi-platinum/gold landmark albums + singles include:

Blink 182’s ‘Enema of The State’, Pink’s‘Funhouse’ and ‘I’m Not Dead’, Steve Winwood’s ‘Back In The High Life’, The Rolling Stone’s ‘Bridges To Babylon’, Fallout Boy’s ‘Infinity on High’, Weezer’s ‘Maladroit’, and Sarah McLachlan’s ‘Mirrorball’ just to name a few. He’s also mixed albums/singles for indie darlings Taking Back Sunday, All Time Low, Sleeping with Siren’s, New Found Glory and Ash Koley. Tom’s world-class ‘Spank Studio’ in South Beach is built around a massive SSL 4064 G+ console. Recent mixes include The Interrupters/Epitaph, Lil Peep + Cailyn Sundry/First Access, Hard rock superstars One Ok Rock


Program

The process of greatness fostering greatness has long been recognized and is the reason why master classes are organized. The Mix With The Master’s seminars is part of this tradition, offering an exchange of in-depth first-hand studio experience and knowledge that is unparalleled and not available anywhere else. Each seminar is conducted by one of the world’s top music mixers and producers, ready to share their professional secrets with a select group of a maximum of 14 carefully-screened, professional-level participants, who come from all over the world.

One factor that contributes to the enormous success of the seminars is that all tutors support the general MWTM ethos, which is about the love of music, music technology and wanting to help others. Participants also are in part selected on displaying similar, positive attitudes. The fact that the seminars last a full week is another major contributory factor because it offers tutors the time and space to go into real depth, and the participants the opportunity to spend a prolonged time watching a master at his peak, and to ask any question they can think of.

The tutors share exclusive, insider-information on any subject: detailed technical knowledge, how to run sessions, how to handle artists, how to manage a career, the right attitude, how to remain successful, and more. The tutors also assess the work of the participants, by listening to their mixes and mixing recording sessions that they bring, and providing extensive feedback to each participant on where they are at, and how they can get to where they want to be. This is invaluable and offers participants wanting to become world-class professionals in their own right a unique advantage.

Another primary factor in making the MWTM seminars exceptional is that they take place at La Fabrique, a large, comfortable, high-end recording studio located in a picturesque historic building, surrounded by huge, lush grounds, and set in the south-east for France in one of the world’s most beautiful environments. The secluded and idyllic location offers the participants and tutors a lot of space to relax and recharge, far away from the hustle and bustle of daily life and the all-demanding intensity of their regular professional environments.

Because the courses are residential, the participants and tutor work, eat, socialize, and sleep in the same environment. While tutors, and participants, will at times opt to retire to their private quarters, there is ample opportunity for social interaction outside of the studio environment. Participants interact extensively with each other and the tutor, making it easier to assimilate the intangible qualities necessary to be successful at the highest level—presence, focus, social skills, intelligence, creativity, the right attitude, and so on.

In short, for seven days participants can experience mixing with a master in both senses of the phrase, mixing and interacting with them. Get more information about Studio La Fabrique

 

 

Phase and Comb Filtering

Summation is a form of acoustical gambling where relative amplitude sets the stakes and relative phase decides the winner. – Bob McCarthy

Throughout this article, we will talk about what is the phase and how it affects our measurements. These concepts will give us clarity in what position to use our measurement microphone; with these techniques I achieve great results in my measurements.

What is the phase?

The phase is related to time, although we must take into account that it is not the only variable that can modify the phase.

To be more clear about what the phase is about, we must remember that the period (T) is the time it takes a wave to develop a complete cycle of a certain frequency. Mathematically:

T (seconds) = 1s/frequency

oT (milliseconds) = 1000 ms/frequency

It is important to take into account that for the audible frequencies (20 Hz – 20,000 Hz) there is a ratio of 1: 1,000. This means that the period of 20 Hz (50 ms) is one thousand times greater than that of 20,000 Hz (0.05 ms).

Taking these details into account, let’s get into the subject.

If we think of a sine wave and its resemblance to an “unfolded” circle, we would think that we can express in what position of the sine wave we are by means of degrees. Being 0 ° the beginning of the wave, 90 ° the value of maximum amplitude, 180 ° half wave, 270 ° the minimum amplitude and 360 ° the end of a complete cycle (and the beginning of the next).

Thinking about this we can associate the phase and the amplitude of a wave to time. Let’s see the following expression.

Being:

ΔØ the resulting phase

Δt the time in which the analysis is done (in milliseconds)

f the frequency

Thinking about this mathematical expression we can realize that the phase is directly proportional to the frequency and time elapsed. Let’s make an analysis of what happens to the phase if it passes 1 ms since it starts a signal.

Resulting phase after 1 ms:

100 Hz = 36 °

500 Hz = 180 °

1,000 Hz = 360 °

1,500 Hz = 540 °

2,000 Hz = 720 °

10,000 Hz = 3,600 °

The phase helps us to know how many cycles or fractions of the cycle have passed after a certain time has elapsed. It should be noted that the phase is a characteristic of the waves and it is not necessary that there is more than one signal to be able to analyze it.

What happens when 2 signals interact?

So far we have talked about the phase in a single signal and this does not seem to have many complications, I dare say that many of us do not even remember that the phase exists until we have more than one correlated signal interacting. The phase relationship between two correlated signals determines what will be the result of the sum of said signals.

Let’s do an exercise.

We are going to use 2 tone generators to generate in both 1,000 Hz with an amplitude of 0dB.

We will see in an oscilloscope the signals of the generators and the sum of both signals.

In this image, we can see that both generators have the same amplitude and the same phase. If we look at the “Resultant” curve, which is the sum of both signals, we can notice how the

amplitude has doubled. If we express the result in dBs we would say that:

 

In this image, we can see that there is a phase difference of 90 ° between the signals. If we observe the “Resultant” curve we can notice how the amplitude has only added up to 1.41 and that the phase of the resulting signal has taken the average value between both signals. If we express the result in dBs we would say that:

 

In this picture, we can see that there is a phase difference of 120 ° between the signals. If we observe the “Resultant” curve we can notice how the amplitude has not added up anything and that the phase of the resulting signal has taken the average value between both signals. If we express the result in dBs we would say that:

In this image, we can see that there is a phase difference of 150 ° between the signals. If we observe the “Resultant” curve we can notice how the amplitude has been attenuated up to 0.5 and that the phase of the resulting signal has taken the average value between both signals. If we express the result in dBs we would say that:

In this image, we can see that there is a 180 ° phase difference between the signals. If we look at the “Resultant” curve we can notice how the amplitude has been canceled completely. If we express the result in dBs we would say that:

From all this, we can conclude that the sum of 2 correlated signals is closely linked to the phase relationship between the two signals. This behavior is summarized in the following equation.

Where:

A1 = Amplitude of signal 1

A2 = Amplitude of signal 2

Δ∅ = Phase difference between signals

And it is visually summarized in the phase circle.

The comb filter

In the previous exercises, we understood how the phase determines whether there is a sum or cancellation when adding 2 signals, but we must take into account that in these exercises we work only with sinusoidal tones, that is, a single frequency. The reality is that we do not work with sinusoidal tones, now we must analyze what happens with full-spectrum signals.

Let’s see the following example:

In this image, we can see the sum of 2 full-spectrum signals. These signals have a time difference of 0.5 ms, which is the period of 2,000 Hz. We know that this difference in time will affect each frequency differently, let’s see some examples:

Δ∅ @ 500 Hz = 90 ° (+ sum 3dB).

Δ∅ @ 1,000 Hz = 180 ° (-100dB attenuation).

Δ∅ @ 2,000 Hz = 360 ° (+ 6dB of sum).

Δ∅ @ 3,000 Hz = 540 ° (-100dB attenuation).

Δ∅ @ 4,000 Hz = 720 ° (+ 6dB sum).

This phenomenon is known as the comb filter, named for the similarity of the graphic to a comb.

How does the comb filter affect our measurements?

We know that the comb filter is the result of adding 2 signals correlated with time differences. When we perform measurements in the field there are many possible causes of the comb filter, one of these causes are reflections.

We can imagine the reflections as a ghost image of the original signal but delayed in time. The reflected signal travels longer, this is what causes the delay.

Let’s see this example done with the  MM1 measuring microphone from Beyerdynamic and a full-range speaker.

In this image, we can see how the direct signal and the reflected signal reach the microphone with a time difference. By means of the impulsive response, we can find out that the time difference is 1.67 ms, which is the 600 Hz period. Let’s see what happens in some frequencies when adding 1.67 ms of difference.

Δ∅ @ 300 Hz = 180 ° (cancellation)

Δ∅ @ 600 Hz = 360 ° (sum)

Δ∅ @ 900 Hz = 540 ° (cancellation)

Etc…

How can we decrease the comb filter in the reflection?

It is already clear that the comb filter is caused by the time difference between both signals, if we want to eliminate the comb filter we could:

In this image, we can see how we have managed to improve our measurement by just placing the microphone on the floor. These measurements are known as “Ground Plane”.

This measurement does not eliminate reflection, instead, we have come so close to the reflection that we can not see the time difference between it and the original signal.

These types of measurements are very helpful when we work in places with very reflective surfaces, allowing us to focus on what the speaker system is really doing. Of course, a person standing sure noticing the presence of the comb filter, but when the room is full of people the same coefficient of sound absorption of the spectators will prevent the reflection can cause comb filters.

Questions:

What does the phase indicate?

The advance or position of a sine wave expressed in degrees

The time difference between 2 speakers

The period of a signal

The polarity of a signal

What is the result of adding 2 tones with the same amplitude but a phase difference of 90°?

+ 3dB

+ 6dB

0dB

-3dB

What is the result of adding 2 tones with the same amplitude but a phase difference of 180 °?

0dB

-6dB

-100dB

You can not know

What is the comb filter?

It is the induction caused by not properly ¨combing the wires¨

It is the result of adding 2 signals correlated with a time difference

It is the result of adding 2 signals not correlated with a time difference

It is the result of adding 2 signals correlated with a reversal of polarity

What are the “Ground Plane” measurements?

In reducing the time difference between the direct signal and the reflected signal in a measurement.

It is about the measurement of the noise that the ants captured during the show.

Remove reflections from the measurement

Reduce the interference caused by the wind


Michael “Mija” Krieg Schreiber

After obtaining an Audio Technician degree in 2010, with a major in live audio, he took a series of courses related to the subject, such as the use of Smaart software, line arrays, the design of reinforcement systems sound, SIM3, processors of open architecture, among many others.

He has worked in various companies, productions, and clubs. He has done installations as an instructor, designer, technician and operator of sound systems, bringing together 9 years of experience to date. Among the companies, productions and venues with which he has worked are Audio Representations, Meyer Sound Mexico, Hi-tech Audio, Papal Mass in San Cristóbal de las Casas 2016, Corona Capital 2014, National Auditorium, Arena Mexico City, among others.

Nowadays he concentrates his career in educational activities offering different presentations and professional audio courses. Among the schools and organizations with which he has collaborated are: Avixa, AES Mexico, National Polytechnic Institute, Technological Institute and Superior Studies of Monterrey, UNITEC Technological University of Mexico, SAE INSTITUTE Mexico, EMEH School of Music of the State of Hidalgo, G Martell, Pro Audio Puebla, among others.

Keeping it Real – Section 2

This is Section 2 of Becky Pell’s 3 Section Article on Using psychoacoustics in IEM mixing and the technology that takes it to the next level. Section 1

Acoustic Reflex Threshold

Have you ever noticed how you and the band can take a break from rehearsing, come back half an hour later, and when put your ears back in everything feels louder? And then how after a few moments it settles down and feels normal again? It’s because of a reflex action of the stapedius muscle in the middle ear. When this little muscle contracts, it pulls the stapes or ‘stirrup bone’ slightly away from the oval window of the cochlea, against which it normally vibrates to transmit pressure waves to be converted into nerve impulses. This action, which is a response to sounds of between 70-100dB SPL, effectively creates a compression effect resulting in a 20dB reduction in what you hear. However, the muscle can’t stay fully contracted for long periods, so after a few seconds, the tension drops to around 50% of the maximum. Whilst the initial reaction, at 150 milliseconds, is not fast enough to fully protect the ear against very loud and sudden transient sounds, it helps in reducing hearing fatigue over longer periods. Interestingly this reflex also occurs when a person vocalises, which helps to explain why a singer’s in-ear mix of the band might sound loud enough in isolation, but when they start singing they find they need more instrumentation. This happens in conjunction with the fact they are hearing themselves not only via the mix but through the bone conductivity of their skull. It’s well worth trying to sing along to an IEM mix that you’ve prepared for a singer to experience what this feels like for them because it’s a very different sensation from simply shouting down the mic to EQ it.

The acoustic reflex threshold also means that transients appear quieter than sustained sounds of the same level, and it’s the thinking behind a compression trick that is often used in studios and film production. When you compress the decay of a short sound such as a drum hit, it fools the brain into thinking the drum hit as a whole is significantly louder and punchier than it is, although the peak level – the transient – has not changed. Personally, I’d advocate caution if you’re going to try this in a monitor mix – the drummer needs to hear what their drums ACTUALLY sound like, and getting things such as drum tuning and mic placement correct at source are vital – but it’s an interesting thing to be aware of.

All in the timing

Our ability to perceive sounds as separate events is not only dependent on there being sufficient difference between them in frequency, but also on timing. This phenomenon is known as the ‘precedence effect’ and the ‘Haas effect.’

These effects describe how when two identical sounds are presented in quick succession, they are heard as a single sound. This perception occurs when the delay between the two sounds is between 1 to 5 ms for single click sounds, but up to 40 ms for more complex sounds such as piano music. When the lag is longer, the second sound is heard as an echo. A single reflection arriving within 5 to 30 ms can be up to 10 dB louder than the direct sound without being perceived as a distinct event. In 1951 Helmut Haas examined how the perception of speech is affected in the presence of a single reflection. He discovered that a reflection arriving later than 1 ms after the direct sound increases the perceived level and spaciousness (more precisely, the perceived width of the sound source), without being heard as a separate sound. This holds true up to around 20ms, at which point the sounds become distinguishable.

This can be an interesting experiment to try with a vocal mic and your IEMs. If you split the vocal mic down two channels, and delay one input somewhere between 1 and 20 ms, see what you notice. Then try panning one input hard left and the other hard right, and see how the vocal sounds thicker and creates a sense of width and space. Play with the delay time, and you’ll see that if it’s too short the signal starts to phase; too long and you lose the illusion. This game does make the signal susceptible to comb-filtering if you sum the inputs back to mono, especially at shorter delay times, so be aware of that.

Once again I would advocate extreme caution if you intend to use this in a monitor mix, as ‘tricking’ a singer in this way can backfire! However it’s a useful principle to be aware of if you have the opportunity to get creative with other sounds, and I use it a lot when adding pre-delay to a reverb – try it for yourself. No pre-delay creates a feeling of immediacy to the effect, but just 5-10ms creates a slight sense of space. If you’re after a little more breathiness and drama – ‘vampires swirling’ as I once heard it described – try increasing the pre-delay up to 20 ms and feel how it changes.

The Haas effect is also something to be very aware of for IEM mixing when it comes to digital latency. Every time we take a signal out of the console and send it somewhere else in the digital domain, a degree of minor time delay known as latency is introduced. Different processing devices introduce different amounts of latency, and obviously the less, the better. The more devices we add, the more the latency stacks up. Whilst a few milliseconds of latency may be totally imperceptible for, say, a guitarist; it’s a different matter when it comes to vocals. A singer will often be able to perceive something as being not quite right, without being able to put their finger on it, because when we vocalise and have that signal returned to our ears, the discrepancy between what we hear at the moment of making the sound, and the moment of it returning, becomes heightened in our awareness. Something to be vigilant about when dealing with any digital outboard such as plug-ins, for a singer.

Location Services

The Haas effect also affects where we perceive a sound to be coming from – the supposed location of the source is determined by the sound which arrives first, even though the sounds may be from two different physical locations. This holds true until the second sound is around 15dB louder than the first when the perception of direction changes.

Sound localisation is a very complex mechanism performed by the human brain. It’s not only dependent on the directional cues received by the ears, but it is also intertwined with the other senses, especially vision and proprioception. Our ability to determine a sound’s location and distance is called binaural hearing, and in addition to all the psychoacoustic effects discussed so far, it is also heavily influenced by the physical shape of our heads, ears, and even torsos. The outer ear or ‘pinna’ functions as a directional sound collector which funnels sound waves into the ear canal. The head and the topography of our face and torso influence how sounds from any position other than a 0° angle are heard, as they create an acoustic ‘shadow.’ Our brains process the differences between the information that our two ears collect, and interpret the results to determine where a sound is coming from, how far away it is, and whether it’s still or moving. At lower frequencies, below about 2kHz, this is mostly determined by the inter-aural time difference; that is, the discrepancy in time between when the sound reaches each ear. Above 2k the information gathered comes from the inter-aural level difference; that is, the discrepancy in volume between the sound that each ear hears. This clever evolutionary adaptation is due to the relative lengths of sound waves at different frequencies. For frequencies below 800 Hz, the dimensions of the head are smaller than the half wavelength of the sound waves so that the brain can determine phase delays between the ears.

However, for frequencies above 1600 Hz the dimensions of the head are greater than the length of the sound waves, so a determination of direction based on phase alone is not possible at higher frequencies; instead, we rely on the level difference between the two ears. These binaural disparities are known as Duplex theory and play an important role for sound localisation in the horizontal plane.

(As the frequency drops below 80 Hz it becomes difficult or impossible to use either time difference or level difference to determine a sound’s lateral source because the phase difference between the ears becomes too small for a directional evaluation, hence the experience of sub-bass frequencies being omnidirectional.)

Whilst this phenomenon makes it easy to sense which side a sound is coming from, it’s harder to determine direction in the up/down and front/back planes, due to our ears being placed at the same horizontal level as each other. Some types of owl have their ears placed at different heights, to allow for greater efficiency in finding prey when hunting at night, but humans have no such facility. This can result in ‘cones of confusion’, where we are unsure as to the elevation of a sound source because all sounds that lie in the mid-sagittal plane have similar inter-aural differences; however, once again the shapes of our bodies help us out. Imagine a sound source is right in front of you. There is a certain detour the torso reflection takes and hence a certain difference of this torso reflection in relation to the direct sound arriving at both ears. This yields a slight comb filter pattern which will change if you elevate this source. The same is true if this source is now moved behind you; the torso reflection changes and our brains process the information discrepancies to help us locate the source.

Next time: In the third and final section of this series on using psychoacoustics to enhance your monitor mixing, we’ll discover a ground-breaking new technology that takes IEMs to a whole new dimension.

Chance to Win Mix with the Masters with Sylvia Massy

SoundGirls this a chance to win a spot at Mix with the Masters with Sylvia Massy. This is a week-long seminar valued approximately at $4,500 and includes lectures and workshops, accommodation within the mansion, catering (breakfast, lunch, dinner) the fitness room, swimming pool and shuttles from Avignon to the studio.

You must have an advanced understanding of audio and work as producer/mixer/engineers to attend Mix with the Masters.

You are responsible for Travel to France.

The upcoming session will take place Feb. 27 – March 5, 2018

You can purchase a raffle ticket for $10 (you can purchase more than one to increase your chances)

We will draw a winner on Jan. 20th

We are also holding a second raffle that is free to enter for a chance to win a 35% discount of Mix with Masters with Sylvia Massy. You can enter here.

You are responsible for Airfare to France


Sylvia Massy is an American entrepreneur, music producer, mixer and engineer, writer and artist in the United States. Massy is perhaps best recognized for her work on 1993’s Undertow, the full-length double platinum-selling debut for Los Angeles rock band Tool and her work with System of a Down, Johnny Cash and Red Hot Chili Peppers.

Massy started out in San Francisco circa 1985 as a producer, engineer, and mixer for Rat Music. This led to her producing the punk band Verbal Abuse for Boner Records, engineering two projects for metal band Exodus and co-producing the Sea Hags independent album with a young guitarist Kirk Hammett, who had just finished the « Master Of Puppets » album with thrash metal group Metallica.

Towards the end of the 1980s, Massy moved from San Francisco to Los Angeles and took a job at Tower Records on Sunset Blvd. At Tower, she met the members of a Buffalo, New York band named Green Jello (later known as Green Jelly) and helped them record their debut independent album. After finally getting on staff at Larrabee Sound in West Hollywood, she was hired by Zoo Records/BMG to produce Green Jello’s major label debut, which featured members of a new Los Angeles group called Tool. On Green Jello’s « Cereal Killer » album, the voice of Tool singer Maynard James Keenan is heard on the song  » Three Little Pigs,» as well as Tool drummer Danny Carey playing on the album. This began a relationship Massy would have with the band Tool that would span two records: Opiate and Undertow.

During her time in Los Angeles, Massy was also an engineer, producer or mixer on recordings from a diverse group of internationally-known artists, including Aerosmith, Babyface, Big Daddy Kane, Bobby Brown, Prince, Julio Iglesias, Seal, Skunk Anansie, Paula Abdul, Ryuichi Sakamoto and many more. She worked with manager Gary Kurfirst on Irish rock band Cyclefly for Kurfirst’s Radioactive Records.
At Larrabee Sound, Sylvia connected with producer Rick Rubin and would work with him on several projects spanning seven years.

From 1994 until 2001, Massy’s vintage Neve 8038 console and other specialized recording equipment occupied Studio B at Sound City Studios in Van Nuys, California. Besides Massy’s own work at Sound City, several other successful projects were recorded on Massy’s equipment during these years, including albums by Sheryl Crow, Queens Of The Stone Age, Black Rebel Motorcycle Club, Smashing Pumpkins, The Black Crowes and Lenny Kravitz. Massy’s equipment is visible in many scenes of Dave Grohl’s « Sound City Movie ».

Massy engineered and mixed several projects for veteran producer Rick Rubin, including Johnny Cash’s album Unchained, which won a Grammy award for Best Country Album in 1997. With Rubin, she also recorded Tom Petty and the Heartbreakers, Slayer, Donovan, Geto Boys, The Black Crowes, Danzig, and System of a Down’s debut album. In the ’90s, Massy also produced many popular artists, including the Red Hot Chili Peppers, Sevendust, and Powerman 5000, which featured guest appearances from Rob Zombie and actor Malachi Throne from Star Trek fame. In 1997, Massy co-produced engineered and mixed Foo Fighters, Björk, Patti Smith, Sonic Youth and others for the Beastie Boys’ « Tibetan Freedom Concert » in New York with Adam Yauch and producer Pat McCarthy. Massy produced an album in the mid-nineties for young rising star Pauley Perrette who went on to play the part of Abby Sciuto in the NCIS television series.

Sylvia Massy will be conducting her second MWTM seminar from February 27 to March 5, 2018.


Program

The process of greatness fostering greatness has long been recognized and is the reason why master classes are organized. The Mix With The Master’s seminars are part of this tradition, offering an exchange of in-depth first-hand studio experience and knowledge that is unparalleled and not available anywhere else. Each seminar is conducted by one of the world’s top music mixers and producers, ready to share his professional secrets with a select group of a maximum of 14 carefully-screened, professional-level participants, who come from all over the world.

One factor that contributes to the enormous success of the seminars is that all tutors support the general MWTM ethos, which is about the love of music, music technology and wanting to help others. Participants also are in part selected on displaying similar, positive attitudes. The fact that the seminars last a full week is another major contributory factor because it offers tutors the time and space to go into real depth, and the participants the opportunity to spend a prolonged time watching a master at his peak, and to ask any question they can think of.

The tutors share exclusive, insider-information on any subject: detailed technical knowledge, how to run sessions, how to handle artists, how to manage a career, the right attitude, how to remain successful, and more. The tutors also assess the work of the participants, by listening to their mixes and mixing recording sessions that they bring, and providing extensive feedback to each participant on where they are at, and how they can get to where they want to be. This is invaluable and offers participants wanting to become world-class professionals in their own right a unique advantage.

Another primary factor in making the MWTM seminars exceptional is that they take place at La Fabrique, a large, comfortable, high-end recording studio located in a picturesque historic building, surrounded by huge, lush grounds, and set in the south-east for France in one of the world’s most beautiful environments. The secluded and idyllic location offers the participants and tutors a lot of space to relax and recharge, far away from the hustle and bustle of daily life and the all-demanding intensity of their regular professional environments.

Because the courses are residential, the participants and tutor work, eat, socialize, and sleep in the same environment. While tutors, and participants, will at times opt to retire to their private quarters, there is ample opportunity for social interaction outside of the studio environment. Participants interact extensively with each other and the tutor, making it easier to assimilate the intangible qualities necessary to be successful at the highest level—presence, focus, social skills, intelligence, creativity, right attitude, and so on.

In short, for seven days participants are able to experience mixing with a master in both senses of the phrase, mixing and interacting with him.

Get more information about Studio La Fabrique

 

 

X